“Two mice are talking to each other, One mouse saying to the other: Are you going to take the vaccine? the other replied: Are you crazy they didn’t finish the human trial yet…”
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko
Dr Mercola interview with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko delve into many aspect of the Corona Virus Pandemic and whole lot more. Dr. Zelenko, is a practicing physician in a Jewish community in Monroe County, New York. When COVID-19 hit his community and patients, the idea of sending them home with no treatment until they became critically ill and needed to go to hospital, just made no sense to him! His research lead to the development of affordable practical and effective protocol for the treatment of people considered at risk, in the early stages of infection to prevent hospitalisation and death.
“If you look at the CDC, they recommend starting the treatment of influenza with antiviral drugs within the first 48 hours, not the week, except when it came to COVID-19. We were told to send patients home, and when they get sicker, send them to the hospital, where there was a good chance they were going to get intubated, especially in March and April.”
“I wanted to understand how this virus works and more importantly, what I can do about it. A series on YouTube called MedCram, Episode 34, saved the world. It explains the biology behind how zinc inhibits RNA polymerase, and the fact that zinc can’t get into the cell. So, it needs help.”
The protocol Dr. Vladimir Zelenko used, is available freely in many languages on his site. It contained Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin (antibiotic) and zinc (mineral) for five days. He explained “Zinc is the bullet and HCQ is the gun” In other words HCQ is used as zinc ‘, meaning it shuttles zinc into the cell. Zinc kills the virus by inhibiting an enzyme associated with viral replication inside the cell. The antibiotic azithromycin is used for bacterial pneumonia prevention along with other secondary bacterial infections common in COVID-19. Over time Zelenko tweaked the his protocol according to individual patients needs.
As we now know – as soon as it was discovered that HCQ could be helpful in preventing COVID-19 deaths, a new war was declared not on the virus, but on the potential cure and those who advocated it.
“When we have a large population of people that need to be treated, it has to be oral, cheap, safe and effective,” Zelenko says. “By the way, this is not new. This information was known in 2005 — even before. There are papers with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s name on it, calling HCQ a miracle drug. Fauci called HCQ a vaccine. There’s a paper in which he called it an absolute dream treatment and vaccine. So, it’s conveniently forgotten but that’s what it is. It’s a matter of scientific record.”
Despite HCQ has been used for about 60 years in treatments of chronic conditions such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. The campaign to discredit its use was underway; Emergency use authorisation was issued for in-hospital use, where typically patients are already in the advanced stages of the disease, and at the same time it could not be used for outpatient.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko outlined how fraudulent studies were used to discredit the use of HCQ and goes on discussion the incentives for using a much more expensive solutions that may of may not work as effectively. It’s difficult not to suspect an ulterior motive when effective treatment is suppressed, or outright prevented. Take a new drugs like Remdesivir – that costs more than $3,000 per treatment – hospitals were paid tens of thousands of dollars more for COVID-19 patients. The lack of incentive to get people well and out of hospital is evident… In contrast, Zelenko’s treatment protocol costs about $20.
Zelenko published a study with two co-authors at the end of June 2020. The study titled “COVID-19 Outpatients – Early Risk-Stratified Treatment with Zinc Plus Low Dose Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: A Retrospective Case Series Study”, (full study is also available as pdf) demonstrates – COVID-19 patients with confirmed positive test, who were treated soon after symptom onset, reduced odds of hospitalisation by 84% and all-cause death by 500% compared to no treatment at all. Feel free to explore the altmetic gismo here
Despite Zelenko sharing his clinical findings with the White House and the National Institutes of Health, he was told they had no use for it! He said:
“What’s happened over the last 20 years is that the academic elite and pharmaceutical industry have bred a monopoly on medical truth,” he says.
“They feel only data generated through randomised control trials, pharmaceutical sponsored trials, or those that are coming out of major academic institutions are to be viewed as truth. Anything coming from a frontline country doctor must be anecdotal.
That’s the crime here. And they created artificial barriers that prevented the flow of common sense and lifesaving information. You know which countries did take it seriously? See, this is a disease of affluence because the rich countries could afford the waste of money. The poor countries like Honduras … they had no options.
They couldn’t afford respirators. They didn’t have enough hospital capacity. So, they gravitated towards the cheap generic approaches. And those are the ones that have the best outcomes.”
The conversation Dr Mercola interview Dr. Vladimir Zelenko goes on to unravel may aspects of this pandemic and a whole lot more. When asked about the need for vaccine he said:
“Two mice are talking to each other, One mouse saying to the other: Are you going to take the vaccine? the other replied: Are you crazy they didn’t finish the human trial yet…”
“I’m so pro-vaccine you can’t imagine. I’ve given tens of thousands of patients vaccinations. I give it to myself and to my children. However, I’m not COVID-19 vaccine positive. And I’ll tell you why: Because the majority of patients under the age of 45 have a near-100% recovery rate with a mild, runny nose from COVID-19. Why would I vaccinate someone with an experimental vaccine?
The answer is not for medical reasons.
Why would I give someone a vaccine, even if they are at high risk, if I can give them prophylaxis and/or early prehospital treatment and have a 100% recovery rate?
Not for medical reasons.
Why would I give a vaccine to someone who’s already had COVID-19 and has antibodies?
Not for medical reasons.
And why would I give a very specific vaccine to someone who is going to be exposed to a ton of different variants and strains and mutations?
I wouldn’t.
What I would use is an approach that inhibits RNA replication of RNA viruses, which works for all the strains, including, potentially, influenza.
That’s the big dirty secret here.”
I highly recommend watching the interview in full.
