Covid-19 mRNA Shots alter DNA within 6 hours

Although Covid-19 might be fading away, the Death by vaccine mandates, forced genetically altering therapeutics for every manufactured disease, and the total surveillance of human activity by digital ids agendas, are far from over.
In fact what we had in the last 2 years was just a demo!

In the video Dr Ardis is hosting Dr. Carrie Madej and Karen Kingston to discuss what are the ingredients in the C19 vaccines why are they in there and what might be the health implication for the individuals who were vaccinated. 

 

Why it’s important to know what is in the patents

If one relies on the news media to get informed on reality, then it might seem like the Covid-19 pandemic is over and done with. All eyes are focused on a new war and the blood letting associated with yet more psychological assault on our hearts and minds goes on and on. Nevertheless although Covid-19 might be fading away, the ‘Death by vaccine mandates’, forced genetically altering therapeutics for every manufactured disease and the total surveillance of human activity by digital ids agendas are far from over, in fact what we had in the last 2 years was just a demo!

In last year’s 2021 G7 summit which took place in the UK, delegates were joined by Sir Patrick Vallance and Melinda French Gates who presented their ‘100 day mission’ to speed up the time it takes to develop vaccines, treatments and diagnostics for future pandemics. The rational behind it; Since we now have a “safe and effective” mRNA vaccines, we can insert ANY synthetic program in the form of mRNA sequence into peoples’ bodies… Problem is mRNA genetic therapeutics are not a Vaccines they are far from being safe and definitely not effective at providing protection on any level.
 
Mind you, when the term “safe and effective” is considered in context of “Population Reduction” and “Death by vaccine mandates” agendas, than it starts to make total sense. Those shots are EFFECTIVE at terminating people while the perpetrators are SAFE from prosecution. This is not the fist time I realised this type of double meaning attached to slogans created for the purpose of mass mind control. Here is another one the public is duped with: “Sustainable Development”, the public understand it to mean ‘Green Development sustaining the environment’, developers on the other hand understand what it really means: Sustaining any kind of development for ever and ever! 
 
I digress… The point I wish to make is that the battle for humans ownership is far from over and we better not fall a sleep at the wheel, thinking we are back to normal. I assure you we are not!
 
At this point you may wonder why I use the term ‘Humans Ownership’. Here is why: Humans are natural entities and as such our DNA can not be patented. According to a Supreme Court ruling – naturally occurring genes are not patentable. That’s good news for anyone who doesn’t like the idea of a company owning patent rights to pieces of our body. But the court also ruled that cDNA, a man-made copy of the genetic messenger in cells, is patentable. (12-398 Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (06/13/2013)).
 

So what is cDNA that can be patented?

Genes, are made of DNA and contain information required to make proteins. To make protein from DNA, first the DNA pulls apart into two separate strands and a copy is made. Instead of DNA, this copy is made of RNA. The copy, called pre-RNA, is not identical to template DNA. It’s a complementary copy. Next, that pre-RNA is edited so that only the parts that encode protein (the exons) remain. This exons-only version is called mRNA. The cell then uses the mRNA to assemble proteins.

Working with RNA is difficult; it is unstable and degrades quickly. For that reason in practice mRNA is extracted and converted back to stable DNA. The new DNA that’s created from the mRNA is called cDNA,  or complementary copy of the DNA template. cDNA can also occur naturally; certain viruses can copy mRNA to cDNA . In fact, this is where scientists learned the technique.

cDNA is an edited version of the original gene. The naturally occurring gene contains exons, introns, and other genetic material; the cDNA contains only exons. Those exons are the same exons as the original DNA, and appear in the same order. You can find more in depth information about this case in an article written by Megan Krench on 

Do Covid-19 mRNA Shots alter our DNA?

Obviously the next thing we need to know is whether or not the mRNA Shots can alter our natural DNA? This was of course vigorously denied, dismissed and thrown on the conspiracy pile, but like many other vigorously denied facts, it turns out the vigorous the denial the more true it actually is!
 
The following image is an archived copy of an anonymous post from Dec 9 2020, before any problems with the shots became known. This unsigned anonymous post No. 295621351 which appeared on 4chan forum was supposedly written by 2 Moderna’s employees a process and industrial engineers.

 

 

Here it is in text form:

“I’m an industrial engineer at Moderna and the other one of us is a process development engineer. I’m sure the same thing is happening with Pfizer-BioNTech. It was hard to put things together based on the small quantities of additions happening in manual step (highly unorthodox for a continuous process production). The explanation we got was highly sensitive trade secret adjuvants being added. Digging in deeper showed how sensitive it actually was.

Most people’s understanding of this novel vaccine type is that it works as follows:

  1. Make mRNA coding for S protein
  2. Make lipid nanoparticle delivery system
  3. Profit

How it actually works from what we’ve uncovered:

  1. Make mRNA coding for S protein
  2. Make mRNA coding for mutant versions of CYP19A1 and CDKN1B in smaller amounts
  3. Make sure that while delivery system for (1) mostly ends up in liver, most of (2) ends up in the gonads
  4. Make sure form and quantity of additive upregulating LINE-1 reverse transcription activity makes it hard to detect among legit adjuvants
  5. Effects from (2) integrated by (4) are recessive; mildly oncogenic effects in vaccine recipients unlikely to be noticed for many years
  6. (5) recessive but since most of population vaccinated, in next generation female offspring have premature ovarian failure”

This was published before vaccination was underway and judging by language used, it seems to come from someone on the inside with professional knowledge. Many allegations in the above post actually checked out as we now know.

The issue of reverse transcription – where mRNA converts DNA in human cells is “very hard to make up without knowing” writes Igor Chudov. This very issue was flagged early on by many scientists Judy Mikovits and Dr. Carrie Madej were ringing those alarm bells right at the start of the pandemic. Not surprising this very issue was dismissed full throttle…

But as it turns out those warnings were on the money big time! And now has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt. 

 

VAX alter DNA

 

A study by Lund University, Lund, Sweden shows ‘Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line’ It is also the title of the study published 25 February 2022 in the current issues of ‘Molecular Biology’. Did anyone see or hear any of it in main stream? Did fact checkers change their claims?

 

“Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

View Full-Text”

Who owns who

In view of all this it seems that those who got the shots and integrated patented synthetic bat virus DNA into their genome, could be legally charged a licensing fee for the rest of their lives. Big Pharma holy grail: Connecting directly to ones veins to suck out what they have for life! And possibly the lives of their offsprings too, if the rest of Moderna’s whistleblowers warning turn out to be true too:
  1. Make mRNA coding for S protein
  2. Make mRNA coding for mutant versions of CYP19A1 and CDKN1B in smaller amounts
  3. Make sure that while delivery system for (1) mostly ends up in liver, most of (2) ends up in the gonads
  4. Make sure form and quantity of additive upregulating LINE-1 reverse transcription activity makes it hard to detect among legit adjuvants
  5. Effects from (2) integrated by (4) are recessive; mildly oncogenic effects in vaccine recipients unlikely to be noticed for many years
  6. (5) recessive but since most of population vaccinated, in next generation female offspring have premature ovarian failure

What it means is that in addition to the mRNA code for S spike, the vaccine vials will contain additional mRNA that codes both for a mutant version of CYP19A1 and a mutant version of CDKN1B. Both are implicated in the female infertility issues

The fact that the lipid nano particles (LNPs) and the mRNA in them end up in the liver and gonads (the primary reproductive organs – testes in male and ovaries in female) was confirmed by the Pfizer pharmacokinetics study leaked by the Japanese government in May 2021. The LNPs and the mRNA do not stay at the injection site, as CDC and other agencies told us. Surprise surprise they accumulate in the liver and the gonads of the vaccinees in high concentrations. More on that, in a great post by Andreas Oehler who writes this about himself:  “Survived the USSR only to see it come back from the grave, globally. Trying to put it back 6 feet under, where it belongs.”

Good things come to those who sign up

Spread the love

Leave a Reply