Vaccine D Day

  • Post category:COVID-19

Dr. Carrie Madej tells Dr. Andrew Kaufman stories of some unusual experiences from her time as a medical student throughout her years of professional career which contribute and shaped her research and views on the totally new and experimental mRNA Corona Virus Vaccines.

Note: See how the video below has been removed from youtube? Rest assured you are not missing anything the content is identical to the one just above it here. I deliberately left it here to demonstrate the level of tech censorship which is rife when it comes to truthful unbiased discussion on anything to do with Pharma or Vaccine. I have one thing to say about that – if all was so great on those front –  no one would have cared if people talked about it.

At the end of this post you may find an automatic English transcript (from youtube).  If you wish to have subtitle in any other language please follow these steps to make it happened.

Yesterday was ‘The D Day’ of the mass vaccination program starting in the UK. The PR machine was in full swing to convince the public this is a safe and necessary step to a return to normal life. Well, is it really? This question challenges all 3 statements;  Is it safe? Is it necessary? and Can there be a return to pre Corona so called ‘Normal life’ with all the new laws and regulations that are here to stay? My Answer to all 3 would be NO, NO and NO! We have every reason to be concerned.

I highly recommend watching the above interview to get another perspective that is increasingly being vigorously omitted from public discourse the censorship surmounted by ALL social media, Tech giants and mainstream media is phenomenal when it comes to Corona Virus and Vaccines! It really begs another question: If all was so hunkydory would the PTB need to silence opposing views? This, in-of-itself rings alarm bells and does not inspire confidence, now does it?

Is it safe?

Yesterday a 90 year old granny who was the 1st person to be vaccinated told the UK public  – It is free – then you should have it If I can have it so can you! Today 2 NHS Health workers reported and confirmed to have adverse side effects ops the term ‘adverse side effects’ has now been rebranded or haven’t you heard it is now called ‘immune response’…

According The Guardian the insert or leaflet or “patient information leaflet with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine says it should not be given to people allergic to any substance in the vaccine”

I wonder, is this “patient information leaflet” even given to every individual before they get vaccinated? Do they actually read it all the way given that the list of ingredients are all the way down at page 5 section 6 the last page?

Lets have a look at that list of ingredients: Click to open

6. Contents of the pack and other information What COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 contains:

    • The active substance is BNT162b2 RNA. After dilution, the vial contains 5 doses, of 0.3 mL with 30 micrograms mRNA each.

The other ingredients are:

    • ALC-0315 = (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate),
    • ALC-0159 = 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide,
    • 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine,
    • cholesterol,
    • potassium chloride,
    • potassium dihydrogen phosphate,
    • sodium chloride,
    • disodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate,
    • sucrose

With mRNA being the main ingredient here and given that this is the first ever Vaccine the is using this technique on humans, I contend that there is very little chance that if one is allergic to it no one would know about it! As for the other ingredients well you will first need to know what they are and I am in doubt that even your Dr would know what they all are, let alone individuals.

The leaflet warns:

potential side effects may occur with following frequencies: Click to open

Very common: may affect more than 1 in 10 people

    • pain at injection site
    • tiredness
    • headache
    • muscle pain
    • chills
    • joint pain
    • fever

Common: may affect up to 1 in 10 people

    • injection site swelling
    • redness at injection site
    • nausea

Uncommon: may affect up to 1 in 100 people

    • enlarged lymph nodes
    • feeling unwell”

Is it really safe?

The MHRA –  Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency in the UK published procurement notice on the 23/10/2020 in ted.europa.eu

“Description of the procurement: The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.

Type of procedure: Award of a contract without prior publication of a call for competition in the Official Journal of the European Union in the cases listed below

    • The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive
Explanation: For reasons of extreme urgency under Regulation 32(2)(c) related to the release of a Covid-19 vaccine MHRA have accelerated the sourcing and implementation of a vaccine specific AI tool. Strictly necessary — it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, if the MHRA does not implement the AI tool, it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health
    • Reasons of extreme urgency — the MHRA recognises that its planned procurement process for the SafetyConnect programme, including the AI tool, would not have concluded by vaccine launch. Leading to a inability to effectively monitor adverse reactions to a Covid-19 vaccine.
    • Events unforeseeable — the Covid-19 crisis is novel and developments in the search of a Covid-19 vaccine have not followed any predictable pattern so far.”

In other words The MHRA anticipates a large number of Covid 19 Vaccine adverse reaction reports which could potentially represent “a direct threat to patient life and public health,” so much so that their current system would not be able to cope.

Health APPs and Body Censors

Finally I wanted to touch on another topic discussed in this interview at the top of this post – Health APPs and Body Censors which are switched on by default on all mobile phones!

Like Carrie I became aware of it a while ago. (early 2016) I was not told about it by anyone, I discovered it when I got a new phone and explored all it’s settings in depth.

In an android phone Body Censors settings are buried deep in ‘google play’ app. Being aware of what it might be used for, I opted switch it off. What happened next was even more interesting… When I tried to access Gmail on the phone, I kept getting popup windows opening up telling me that in order to read my emails I need to have Body Censor switched on! Those pop up messages where so intrusive, to the extent that it rendered gmail useless. Now I ask you 1. Why would google want body censor to be switched on when we read /write emails? Obviously this is not necessary since we use gmail on devices that do not have body censors! and 2. How many people you know who would not switch Body Censor back on when presented with this choice? That is if they knew it was on in the first place of course…

Welcome to a our new normal
A one world Pharma/Tech dictatorship.
It is not the future it is the present!

Good things come to those who sign up

Emails are sent once a week only if new material is published here

Spread the love

This Post Has One Comment

Leave a Reply