Alex Newman interviewed Dr. Lee Merrit, a former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), where she outlines how Coronavirus and the mRNA vaccines could be weaponised for binary biological warfare. Whether Covid19 virus was released on purpose or by accident, the implications are enormous. When it comes to the new vaccines, Dr. Merrit, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, goes through previous animal studies on the technology and paints a dire picture. However, even though modern medical schools do not often teach it, there are ways to treat viral infections that are time-tested and effective.
Needless to say this video was taken down by youtube as soon it was uploaded…
“Let’s give people the ability to defend themselves – this is like saying we are going to have a missile attack coming but you can’t build sand begs, you can’t have a basement, you can’t have a bomb shelter. NO! That’s not right. You should be able to have a defence, doctors should be aware of the defence. We’ve got to quit lying about the defence. You should have six things… I have a little Covid kit in my office: NAC, vitamin C and D, Zink, Selenium and Quercetin”
Dr. Lee Merrit
Biological weapons of the future
A report presented in August 2019 by the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge stated that the biological weapons of the future, armed with artificial intelligence and genetic manipulation, would have the power to attack a specific DNA and potentially eliminate only certain particular breeds without affecting others. The authors warned that: Technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated at cheaper prices, democratising the ability to do harm faster and more lethally. In a particularly negative case, a biological weapon could be constructed to target a specific ethnic group based on its genomic profile. The unfavourable report also warns that an AI could become an “extremely harmful and potentially unstoppable” weapon.
The ‘horizon scanning’ study pointed toward the pressing concern of surveillance through DNA databases. “China has already used blood sampling to target the Muslim Uighur population. Commercial DNA databases have become popular and may become the next frontier of ‘Surveillance Capitalism’ or state surveillance,” said Dr Luke Kemp
One of the highest-ranked issues for the longer-term future was the malicious uses of neurochemistry. The experts argue that advances in neuroscience and bioengineering could lead to new beneficial drugs and ‘nootropics’, but also new weapons.
“Imagine a world in which law enforcement uses drugs to placate and control crowds, greatly diminishing the promise of non-violent protest movements on climate and social justice,” Kemp said.
In the intro to ’80 Questions for UK Biological Security’ it states:
“The UK Government’s approach to managing biological security threats has evolved with the publication of the UK Biological Security Strategy in 2018 [5].
The Strategy consists of four pillars:
-
- understand current and future risks;
- prevent risks from threatening the UK and its interests;
- detect biological risks as early and reliably as possible, and;
- respond to biological risks to mitigate their impact and speed recovery.
These pillars are complemented by two themes:
-
- ensuring that government response if underpinned by appropriate scientific capacity and capabilities, and;
- to capitalise on opportunities offered by the biological sector.”
The UK government developed and published this in 2018. However at the end of 2019 when SARS-CoV2 came around were they ready? Did they follow their own good advice?
The only thing I would say they did is: “capitalise on opportunities offered by the biological sector.”
More on what the future may hold
Experts ‘scan horizon’ to help prepare governments for next major biosecurity threat
Point of View: Bioengineering horizon scan 2020 | May 29, 2020
80 questions for UK biological security | January 6, 2021
